Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Social Filmmaking’ Category

NewImage

The iPad is a wonderful personal productivity, entertainment, and still photography too, but now for filmmaking as well. We often forget the best advice given on the subject of cameras, “The best camera is the one you have with you.” It is equally true now for videography, just as it was then for still photography. The iPad can comfortably help the social documentarian capture those moments, no matter where you go.

However, the iPad as a film tool is very different from traditional cameras. It lack any real depth of field (DOF), is very light weight (often making video shaky), fixed aperture and shutter (you must live within the given lighting conditions), and limited to 720p/30fps. So, you need to think ahead when using the iPad as a social filmmaking tool.

A Few Tips to Consider:

>> Hold the iPad with both hands and position it to the left/right of your center, just under your chin. This creates a tradition off axis interview that is fairly stable. Trying to hold the iPad at head level is very awkward, inducing lots of motion as well as making the interviewee feel uncomfortable.

>> Start recording before you start the actual interview. Electrons are pretty cheap these days, so using the extra footage is not going to cost you anything. The worst thing to happen, during that once in a lifetime interview, is to miss that great initial comment because you did not press the red start button in time.

NewImage

>> Make sure you get 30-60 sec of background sound. In post, you will need to cover some of the edit with audio, so take the minute and roll some extra footage to capture the ambient sound.

>> Stabilize your footage in post. Once you comp the scene into place, stabilize it. We often don’t have the luxury, or equipment, to put the iPad on a tripod and even the sturdiest of hands will still induce some motion. Take the 5 min in post to stabilize the shots. I use the Stabilization algorithm in After Effects CS 5.5, which produces great results out of the box.

>> Use an external microphone, if practical. This is a luxury I plan for whenever possible. The iPad audio is pretty good, but piping in a shotgun or lavaliere mic will make the interview even better.

>> Clean up the audio in post. If you can’t use an external mic, then do some post audio clean up one of your favor audio tools. I use Adobe Audition since it is integrated with Premiere Pro and has excellent spectral touchup tools.

NewImage

>> Field edit with iMovie. Don’t be afraid to review you dailies and create a few edits in the field with iMovie. While I would not necessarily cut my final documentary in iMovie (some have…very interesting), it is a great field tool to review footage and cut out the junk. So take advantage of the time between protests.

>> Add DOF in post. Lack of DOF is a dead giveaway with it come to creating a film look. Cameras like the Canon 7D and Red Epic have it, while iPads and iPhones do not. Not to worry, because you can create a virtual DOF in post by adding a masked lens blur. In After Effects, this is a simple as creating an adjustment layer, adding a camera lens blur, and creating an animated mask around the subject.

I recently put all these tips into play during the Occupy Philadelphia protest. With iPad in hand, armed with my three core questions (who are you, why are you here, and what do you want to change), I produce a few interviews capturing the moment. Please check out Occupy Philadelphia: Money is Wrong.

So, what is missing? Do you have any tips and experiences as it relates to smartphone (iPad/iPhone) filmmaking? Is so, please leave a comment.

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpgAre there any best practice approaches to structuring a documentary film? I am big believer in the Aristotelian approach to story telling, because it seems to be one of the better frameworks capable of capturing the attention span of a diverse audience. The Aristotelian documentary story line centers around three acts:

 

Act I:0 -25% duration) The Problem – The protagonist’s (subject’s) life before some significant event, with the introduction of the antagonist;

Plot Point 1) Some significant event occurs that challenges the subject, typically introduced by the antagonist;

Act II: 25-75% duration ) The Journey – How the subject deals with the event, the ups and downs, the ins and outs, lots of tension, lots of failures – the battle between the protagonist and antagonist;

Plot Point 2) The subject sees the resolution to the problem;

Act III: 75-95% duration) How the subject finally overcame and conquered the problem, betting the antagonist;

Finale:95-100%) The subjects new life after overcoming everything.

 

You can see this approach used in numerous documentaries, The King of Kong – Fistful of Quarters being just one great example. The first quarter of the documentary is mostly about Steve Wiebe’s life prior to his scoring a Donkey Kong recorder (act 1), which was disallowed (plot point 1). Act II, the middle, follows the battle between Steve and Billy Mitchell (record holder) through their ups and down. Finally, Steve decided to take on Billy in public (plot point 2). The final battle (act III) is all about this big Donkey Kong event. No spoiler, you need to watch it to see how it turns out.

So, this Aristotelian approach works. But are there other formats that work just as well?

 

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpg

As part of an ongoing discussion investigating best practices in documentary filmmaking; for this thread, I would like to explore planning. When making a documentary that is not driven by a script, what are the necessary pre-production and production activities (without which you would fail)? Here are a few that I have initially found:

1. Develop a general description of the project – log line, concept (title, length, format, etc.), narrative (where significance is discussed), external approvals (support), activities, and needs. Here is a key example: Redemption:Transforming Lives through the Humane Society of Knox County (http://tinyurl.com/28ob495)

2. Identify who should be interviewed – major and minor players, direct and indirect, inside the industry and out. Brainstorm list (wish list), essential list (without which there is not a documentary), and b-roll list (supporting).

3. Resource locations for potential shoots – Identify places, locations, and landmarks that are essential in supporting the main theme of the documentary.  Again, there should be brainstorm list (wish list), essential list (without which there is not a documentary), and b-roll list (supporting).

4. Describes situations or events that should be documented – describe the kinds of activities and the stages the documentary will go through. In Restrepo, pre-deployment training ride, deploying in helicopters, inside village homes, etc.

5. Have a schedule that is flexible enough to let the story evolve – If the documentary is unscripted, the plan and schedule need to be flexible enough to allow for the documentary objectives given unforeseen circumstances. Unfortunately, increased flexibility usually means costs, so add extra in the budget (20-25%).

This is just a few items that many have identify. What do use see is missing?

 

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpgThe Documentary Filmmakers Handbook is another excellent source of information. Genenvieve Jolliffe and Andrew Zinnes provide a fairly comprehensive view from training to legal, from pre-production to post-production. On page 276, Ian Wright, one of the many contributors, lays out 10 interviewing techniques he uses:

 

1. Relax your subjects by talking about a non-subject issue.

2. Don’t schedule more than two to three interviews a day so that you stay fresh

3. Keep your subject from saying things in pre-interviews. It’s hard to recapture that magic in the second go around.

4. Be honest with your subject and they will open up to you.

5. Keep eye contact. This keeps your subject engaged, so don’t look through your notes while they are talking.

6. Don’t speak while your subject is speaking. Active listening is good for day to day conversations, but it will wreak havoc in your edit sessions if your voice is there – unless you’re part of the film.

7. For more formal interviews, have your subject repeat the questions as part of their answer.

8. Try not to be too encumbered by people and equipment when interviewing.

9. If a subject is lying to you or being difficult, you can confront them on it as long as you know you’re right.

10. Don’t speak too much. It’s not your question that is important – it’s their answer. It’s a human reaction to fill silence so they might give you more if you say less.

If you missed this discuss, make sure you check out:

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Web Resources

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Peer Dialogue

Interviewing Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Part 2

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers

 

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpgThere is a wealth of information on documentary interviewing techniques and this discussion is only one small view.Here are five other resources pulled from the 4,420,000 possible Google threads:

The Art of the Documentary Interview – “ A great interview is a lesson in the art of eliciting a story from your interviewee. Not just any story, but their story. Told in their own words, but in a manner that is focused, engaging, and has a clear beginning, middle and end.”

Interview tips for documentary filmmaking – “For those of you who are thinking of getting into documentary filmmaking or those of you who just want to brush up on your skills, here are some tips for getting the perfect interview.”

Interviewing Techniques – “Here are some tips on conducting interviews for your documentary”

Documentary Filmmakers Handbook - Google Books is a great resource for just about any endeavor, filmmaking being a good example. Check out this section “Some Interview Techniques.”

Interview Techniques from the Film Lab – Tung and Cheek video on how and how not to conduct interviews.

What is your favorite reference source?

Make sure to check out the rest of the articles:

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Peer Dialogue

Interviewing Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Part 2

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpgIf you haven’t participated in this topic already, please check out the Documentary Filmmaker’s Group discussion on this topic. In that conversation, Marinella Nicolson  makes the observation:

 

NewImage.jpgMarinella Nicolson • “I think you’ve hit all the major points in your article – it’s a very good guide for someone starting out. There’s one suggestion I could add, that I found quite effective when interviewing people, and that was to get them to do something during the interview. It’s best to choose something they’re very familiar with, even if it’s only washing the dishes. There’s something about the repetitive physical action that makes the interviewee feel less stiff and awkward in front of the camera, and for the viewer, seeing a person in their natural environment seems to add so much more subliminal information to the interview.”

 

NewImage.jpgJerry Smith • Marinella, your right, having the subject perform tasks that are part of their “normal” life activities tends to put them in a familiar space, allowing them to be more comfortable. There are several example of this in Restrepo, for example, most notably the scene where they are talking about why the Taliban is not fighting right after an American attack.

 

NewImage.jpgRebekah Tolley • I work as producer to renowned documentarist Michael Grigsby, who has made a career out of ‘giving a voice to the voiceless’ and allowing people the ‘space’ to ‘be’ and to get their points across…a style of working quite at odds with so much of the frenetic film vocabulary of today, where directors often don’t have the confidence to hold back from filling in space…Moreover, it isn’t even the words that emerge from such silence, but rather those reflective moments in a person’s face (if they are allowed such time) which ironically often reveal far more to an audience than the interjection of yet another leading question or worse still commentary which ‘tells’ an audience how to feel or think, rather than allowing them to draw their own conclusions.

NewImage.jpgJerry Smith • Rebekah – You’re right, the emotion picture painted from a subject’s expressions during the silent period is worth a 1000 words. Again, I truly hate to over use Restrepo, but take a look at the interview towards the then of the film. Each subject is held in camera for 8-10 seconds, silent, looking, reflecting inwards. From there, a J-cut (audio first) to more fighting. Very powerful interview & composite combination.

 

NewImage.jpgFrom the Documentarians Discussion group,  Vivian Kleiman makes the following point:

 

 

NewImage.jpgVivian Kleiman • I especially find that in-between time during an interview — between the end of their last comment and when they wait to see if you’ll comment on it, or ask another question — to be very rich terrain.

 

 

NewImage.jpg

Jerry Smith • Vivian – Is this an example of using silence? Cognitively, people are active by nature. We want do or say something. Having that quiet time between question seems to promote unsolicited responses, ones that are often very important to the subject. Right?

 

 

NewImage.jpg

Mark Solomon • I worked for years as a trial lawyer before reinventing myself as a production sound mixer and audio post editor/sound designer. The techniques of examining a witness and conducting an interview are similar, so here are some of my comments: Study the interviews of the masters of the form like Orianna Fallaci, Jonathan Cott, Claude Lanzmann,etc. Develop your own style of questioning. Some interviews demand a more confrontational approach, others require a gentler approach depending on the subject matter and the attitude of the subject. Know your subject and subject matter well enough to forget about your prepared questions and follow the story. Remember that in general people like to talk about themselves, and to demonstrate how much they know. Give them the space to do just that. If the subject seems to be holding back information, after they stop answering a question continue to make eye contact and say nothing before rushing to the next question. That indicates to the subject you expect more from them. Structure the interview to elicit the information that your audience wants to hear, i.e. don’t waste time asking questions that are of no interest or concern to your audience.

NewImage.jpg

Jerry Smith • Mark – Awesome additions. The psychology of making and/or holding eye contact they stop answering a question is a very powerful technique for pulling additional information out. Thanks.

 

 

 

Please check out the dialogue and contribute. Here is a link to the first two articles on interviewing:

Interviewing Techniques for Social Filmmakers – Part 2

Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers


Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpg

This is just a brief update to the original “Interview Techniques for Social Filmmakers” blog posted yesterday.

I came across an excellent online resource in interviewing techniques that is worth reading: “The Art of the Interview,” by David Tamés. Here are a few highlights from this very comprehensive view on the subject.

 

Interviewing Tips:

>> Interviewees are talking with you, not the camera, not the crew

>> Don’t just run through a list of questions, that’s a formula for boredom, questions are just to help you keep things going; conversation, stories, and following up on what your interviewee is excited about is more important

>> Don’t have people restate, rather, ask for clarification or an explanation of the thing you want them to restate, much better for conversation flow

>> Make sure your interviewee has access to water (room temperature or cool, not cold)

>> Soft Rembrandt lighting is not only more dimensional, but the key is less direct on the interviewees eyes, thus more comfortable for them.

 

NewImage.jpg

Seven Habits of Highly Effective Interviewers:

1. Always get a signed personal release form

2. Do research & preparation, pre-interview if applicable

3. Empathy and respect

4. Follow up on what excites your interviewee

5. Active listening: maintain, eye contact, don’t cut people off …

6. Interview to elicit STORIES from people, not just information

7. Allow pauses, sometimes yields more, and better room tone too!

 

 

For more information, make sure you check out David’s work at The Art of the Interview.

 

Read Full Post »

NewImage.jpgIn social filmmaking, a documentary-style venue usually has a narrator telling a story, intercut with other interviewed subjects. Getting the subject to open up in a manner that can shed revealing light during these brief interspersed moments is more of an art than science. The goal is not so much to have a conversation with the subject, but to generate statements from them that can stand on their own without the context of the interviewer’s question, ultimately supporting the movement of the documentary. So, while there is no one approach, there are a few proven techniques that seem to work well in many situations.

1. Talk before shooting – Interviewing is a trust based process, so keep the camera off while you are establishing an initial level of rapport with your subject. Think about conducting a few preliminary interviews without a documentary crew or cameras as a means to help develop a friendship. Think about it, your best conversations come from meaningful relations, ones built through the benefit of time.  It took Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington (filmmakers of Restrepo) two trips each conducted over four months in total before the soldiers were comfortable enough to let the stories come out.  If you haven’t read it already, check out their interview “The Making of Restrepo.

NewImage.jpg

2. Warm Up - When you do show up with your crew and/or cameras, get your subject familiar to the lights and the camera but don’t start shooting until you can see that they are comfortable with the people, equipment, and the process. Your first questions should be basic ones that become the building blocks of for future questions as well as your relationship. Ask questions about family history, personal background, education, etc. You also need to think about the question/response format. If you don’t plan on hearing your voices asking the question (“Can you please tell me your name and where you are from?”), then you need to give the subject time to get use to formating their response in the form of a question (“My name is John Watkins and I am from Los Angles, CA).

3. Ask permission – Some of the best questions you need to ask will most likely be the toughest for the subject to answer. So ask at least one permission-based question prior to doing so. For example, “I’m going to push you today, if that’s okay?” or “ “Do you mind if I ask you some uncomfortable questions?” Most of the time they say “yes” or they wouldn’t have agreed to the interview to begin with. However, do so build trust, acknowledges the possible discomfort they might feel, and give them mental permission to feel uncomfortable.

4. Hush – Let the subject fill in the silences of the pause. It is human nature to want to say something during that long long pause, but that nature should not come from you. Don’t try to rescue the subject too quickly from those uncomfortable pauses; instead, let them fill in the conversational gaps. In doing so,  you will get access to deeper and more personal information. The mind always has an answer, so give the lips time to response. Check out the post combat interview in Restrepo or  Werner Herzog documentaries to see how these techniques are effectively used.

NewImage.jpg5.Pain and Aspirations – As they say, everything is a love story. So, if you are not connecting at a very passionate emotional level, then the interview will come off as boring. Look for their pain and/or joy. Don’t be afraid to ask questions around how they feel or felt. Remember, you must be genuinely interested in your subject for them to open up to you.

6. The art of the “open ended question.” Open ended questions are far better source of personal information than traditional leading questions. Leading questions get your subjects to answer with “yes” or “no” responses. Open ended question often start with “why” or “how.” However, reformatting them in a more declarative phase such as, “I am not sure I understand” or “Tell me more about that,” leads to a source of information beyond your insight.

7. Repeat their words or concepts. One of the most powerful interviewing techniques is too repeat one or two words from the subject’s last response. For example, your subject may end their comment about loosing a friend or family member by saying “it’s just not fair”. You’re next questions could simply be “fair?”

8. Empathy& Feelings. If your subject isn’t giving you what you want, they you haven’t connected with their feeling yet. Start rethinking the problem by asking what would you do if you were in their situation and what things would make you talk under similar circumstances? You can only unlock your subject when you unlock yourself.NewImage.jpg

Lastly, all of this is worthless unless you practice practice practice. Your subject will be as relaxed and confident with the process as you are. When you feel awkward, they will as well. This state can jeopardize the interview and potentially the documentary well.  Practice sessions need not be formal and take place in everyday situations between your friends and family. You want a tough interview, try asking a 16 teen year old about their school day. If you can get meaningful insights from them, then you’re ready to move on.

 

Read Full Post »

 

NewImage.jpg

Blogging is an important part of the social filmmaking process. Without it, the ability to tell stories to other communities would be severely hampered. Many people, however, question the “science” behind the process and are looking for just that one piece of data to get them going. Well, I think it is here.

I don’t usually promote webinars, but I am going to make an exception. On December 9, HubSpot is putting on a free webinar called, “ The Science of Blogging.” The agenda looks interesting, especially if you are looking for quantitative reasons to start or continue your work.  71.4% of consumers say that blogs effect their purchasing decisions “somewhat” or “very much.” Seems interesting.

Here is their agenda and I will be blogging about it afterwards:

– A round of live blogging reviews (register for the webinar to get your blog reviewed)

– Tips about the best times and days to post

– Trigger words you can use to make your posts go viral

– How to get your posts shared on Twitter and Facebook

You can find registration information at their Registration Link.

Read Full Post »

Social filmmaking connects different communities through film-based story telling. In social computing terms, the film is the media and its context is what makes it sharable, thus being a type of social media. As such, social filmmaking becomes the application of social computing technologies to the documentary filmmaking workflow.

But before we dig into these new tools, let’s briefly review some traditional tools used in most filmmaking workflows. Preproduction leverages Number to Gorilla for planning/budgeting, Final Draft AV for script management, and Storyboard to Frameforge for revisualization. The use of these tools, mostly adopted by traditional filmmakers, are proving just as productive in keeping costs low and increasing the likelihood of success.

In production, beyond the cameras and lights, we see the emergence of Movie Slate and DSLT Slate as low cost alternatives to time-code enabled digital slates and OnLocation as a means of shot management through metadata. Metadata is emerging as a production asset that is just as valuable as the digital connect itself.

Post-production has traditionally been dominated by Final Cut Pro and Avid suites, but today we see Adobe-based production beginning to displace them with their end-to-end metadata driven workflow center on Premier Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, and Soundbooth. All in all, these tools, taken together or just in parts, should be familiar to most documentarians.

With these tools as a foundation, social filmmaking requires other capabilities that aid in the realization of community to community story telling. These tools facilitate funding, create and connect communities, and facilitate the distribution of content.

Pre-production

- Facebook (personal and pages) and LinkedIn: these are two of the most popular forms of Web 2.0 tools. Through these tools, one can create public, private, and professional networks and/or communities.

- Crowdwise: A community portal designed to let everyone contribute their ideas and help build consensus about what kind of film needs to be made.

- Crowdrise: Social filmmaking is funded by the larger community and Crowdrise is the a key social network for raising money in a fun way.

Production

- Twiki and MediaWiki: Wikis are another type of website, but one that allows for the easy creation and editing of content by community members (typically non-technical). They allow production and postproduction team members to share creative, editorial, and compositional content. For a complete listing, make sure you check out WikiMatrix.

- WordPress, Ning, and Blogger: There are the premier social networks for organizing, activating, and influencing the a social filmmaking network.

Post-production

- Vimeo, YouTube, Flickr: A principal means of managing and distributing photo and video content. Vimeo, while having access to sizably small community, has several tools that are more beneficial to filmmakers (e.g., the ability to reload footage to the same URL, accredit contributors, etc.)

- delicious and digg: Allows you organize, tag, and generate recommendations to social sites and content, especially the film-based social media being generated by your work.

- Twitter: Microblogging is a capability that is can be useful during any phase of the filmmaking workflow, but is a necessity during postproduction, specifically distribution.

Wildcards

- Livescribe: Notes are an important part of any successful production, whether digital or handwritten. Pen and paper, however, lends itself to freer levels of creativity but lower levels of sharability. Livescribe, a digital pen and paper solution, achieves the benefits without its disadvantages. In addition to capturing content, you can also share information within other documents as well as posting to community portals.

- HootSuite: Social media management dashboard for most of the tools discussed. HootSuite allows you to manage multiple social media accounts, create and schedule community messages, identify and understand community trends, and add members to the community. Very powerful and very useful to the social filmmaker that is always on the go.

So, there you go. While a bit more than ten, these tools (and categories) are essential for social filmmaking. They enable effective idea creation and fundraising, enable disparate members to creatively collaborate, and content to be social distributed. All in all, today’s documentarian needs to be more than just filmmaking skills and tools, to be successful, they need to also be effective at community outreach through social networks as well. 


Next: Aristotle’s View On Social Filmmaking

 

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.